FFC Bloggers Network

Lamps rejects big money China deal

Date: 15th January 2013 at 4:45 pm
Written by | Comments (1)

They say footballers lack intelligence yet Frank Lampard has proved once again that he is an exception to this rule. The Football Transfer Tavern has burst into life after the Daily Mail claimed he turned down an approach from China.

Lamps has shown intelligence and a lack of greed quite remarkable for a footballer after rejecting the £20 million deal placed on the table from Guizhou Renhe. Whilst we mere mortals would jump at the chance to earn that much money for a couple of years Frank might have been put off by the experiences of Didier Drogba and Nicolas Anelka. Both are former team mates of course and both have found life in China quite difficult to say the least.

With Drogba back training at Cobham, it seems that he may have advised Lamaprd what not to do when a Chinese club comes calling and it looks like the midfielder is likely to look elsewhere for his next move. Let’s face it, Chelsea’s second highest goal scorer is not short of offers and it seems the only people who think he should be let go by current club Chelsea are Rafael Benitez and Roman Abramovich. Well Benitez managed to steer treble winning Inter Milan into the drop zone during his brief stay there and Abramovich has made the term ‘managerial merry-go-round’ practically dictionary worthy.

Do you think Lampard is right to turn the big money move down? Vote in our polls below.

 

Refresh this transfer rumour!
          0 votes
 


1 Comment

- Leave a comment
  • Victor
    January 15th, 2013

    What utter rubbish! Rafa has repeatedly praised Lampard and clearly he was not at Chelsea when the decision was made not to offer Lampard a new cotnracdt. Rafa did not steer Inter into the drip zone. He won two cups with them and they finished 7th with two games in hand when he left – he resigned because they refused to buy the players they had promised him when he took the job.

    Reply

Your Comment:




 

You need to log in to vote

The blog owner requires users to be logged in to be able to vote for this post.

Alternatively, if you do not have an account yet you can create one here.

Powered by Vote It Up