Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  1. Home
  2. Wolves Transfer Rumours

Wolves: Fans fume over Divock Origi transfer update

Wolves: Fans fume over Divock Origi transfer update -Wolves Transfer Rumours

Many Wolves fans have been left fuming over a transfer update involving Divock Origi.

As per football journalist and transfer expert Ekrem Konur, the Midlands club have made a £10m bid to try and sign the Liverpool striker before the summer window shuts.

Should Wolves sign Origi?





However, Jurgen Klopp’s team are demanding a fee in the region of £20m for his signature.

Origi has not exactly been the prolific forward that the Reds would have hoped for when they signed him, scoring just one goal in the 2020/21 season – he has not reached double figures in all competitions over the last four campaigns (Transfermarkt).

1 of 10

Only the biggest Wolves fan will get 100% on this Bruno Lage quiz! First up, where did he manage before Molineux?

Thus, it is not a surprise at all to see so many members of the Molineux faithful against a potential move for the Belgium international.

Wolves fans on Origi transfer update

These WWFC supporters were left fuming as the news of their £10m bid for Origi was shared by Talking Wolves on their Twitter page:

“We need to stop buying Liverpool cast offs. However, just isn’t good enough and Origi turned us down 3 years ago.”

Credit: @donotbuyfrom

“Both teams having a laugh. Championship at best”

Credit: @OhAnotherWolf

“I hate my club”

Credit: @wwfc_bibb

“Not for me thank you don’t think he is worth £10 million no chance is he worth £20 mil”

Credit: @markthompson94


Credit: @AndyByr72089874

“Not worth £10m never mind £20M. Jeff would be very silly to spend that amount on Origi.”

Credit: @W4768721431

In other news, find out what transfer update has Wanderers buzzing here!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top

Article title: Wolves: Fans fume over Divock Origi transfer update

Please leave feedback to help us improve the site: