Do Not Sell My Personal Information
  1. Home
  2. Wolves Transfer Rumours

Wolves: Fans react to Rafael Leao transfer update

Wolves: Fans react to Rafael Leao transfer update -Wolves Transfer Rumours

Some Wolves fans have been left reacting as a transfer update emerged on Rafael Leao.

As per MilanNews.it, the striker will not be sold by AC Milan before the summer window shuts.

Should Wolves sign Leao?

Yes

Yes

No

No

Leao has reportedly been linked with a potential move to the Midlands club throughout the window, but it looks now as if any deal is off the cards.

It has been seen as a blessing in disguise by some members of the Molineux faithful, given that he only managed to score a mere seven goals in 40 matches in all competitions over the course of the 2020/21 term (Transfermarkt), and has also been criticised for his attitude when on the pitch.

1 of 10
bruno-lage-wolves

Only the biggest Wolves fan will get 100% on this Bruno Lage quiz! First up, where did he manage before Molineux?

Bruno Lage also has the likes of Raul Jimenez, Fabio Silva and Rafa Mir currently in his squad as options up top, and so they should really be focusing on strengthening in other positions.

Wolves fans on Leao transfer update

These WWFC supporters gave their reactions as the transfer update was shared on Twitter:

“Kind of happy about this just so we can focus on signing players in the midfield or defence”

Credit: @Millenwwfc

“Good, we don’t need another winger! We need a CM!! #wwfc”

Credit: @CallumONeill93

“We don’t need him anyway”

Credit: @Dreapers03

“I’m glad he’s not leaving Milan. He sucks big time. Very lazy player”

Credit: @pcaseiro

“Good sign Matthew Hoppe”

Credit: @capzwwfc

“Good now sign Palhinha”

Credit: @wwfcglover

In other news, find out whose Olympics performance has been lauded by Wanderers here!


Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

To Top

Article title: Wolves: Fans react to Rafael Leao transfer update

Please leave feedback to help us improve the site: